SFS vs ZTG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SFS | ZTG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.43% | −0.51% | −1.33% |
| 1 week | −0.84% | −1.41% | −0.68% |
| 1 month | −3.96% | −1.84% | −2.96% |
| 3 months | −2.02% | −0.94% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 2.18% | 6.67% | 2.05% |
| YTD | 20.57% | 19.90% | 17.79% |
| 1 year | 25.65% | 23.96% | 24.45% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SFS vs ZTG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SFS leads in 3 and ZTG leads in 6. SFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZTG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZTG leads (−0.51% vs −1.43%). 1 week: SFS leads (−0.84% vs −1.41%). 1 month: ZTG leads (−1.84% vs −3.96%). 3 months: ZTG leads (−0.94% vs −2.02%). 6 months: ZTG leads (6.67% vs 2.18%). YTD: SFS leads (20.57% vs 19.90%). 1 year: SFS leads (25.65% vs 23.96%). Size (TRY): ZTG leads (30.8M vs 28.7M). Investors: ZTG leads (966 vs 60).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SFS or ZTG?
Year to date SFS returned 20.57% and ZTG returned 19.90%; over the last year SFS returned 25.65% and ZTG returned 23.96%. Over the last month SFS returned −3.96% and ZTG returned −1.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SFS or ZTG?
As of November 2, 2026, SFS has a size of TRY 28.7M with 60 investors, while ZTG has a size of TRY 30.8M with 966 investors. ZTG leads in size and ZTG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SFS and ZTG mean?
The CMB risk score of SFS is 5 out of 7 and that of ZTG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.