Yatırımcı.AI

EYT vs ZTG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

EYTZTG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EYT vs ZTG Fund Comparison
MetricEYTZTGCategory median
Daily−1.38%−0.51%−1.33%
1 week−0.66%−1.41%−0.68%
1 month−2.46%−1.84%−2.96%
3 months2.10%−0.94%0.00%
6 months5.88%6.67%2.05%
YTD22.20%19.90%17.79%
1 year32.88%23.96%24.45%
3 years63.66%—158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EYT vs ZTG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EYT leads in 6 and ZTG leads in 4. EYT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZTG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZTG leads (−0.51% vs −1.38%). 1 week: EYT leads (−0.66% vs −1.41%). 1 month: ZTG leads (−1.84% vs −2.46%). 3 months: EYT leads (2.10% vs −0.94%). 6 months: ZTG leads (6.67% vs 5.88%). YTD: EYT leads (22.20% vs 19.90%). 1 year: EYT leads (32.88% vs 23.96%). Size (TRY): EYT leads (31.2M vs 30.8M). Investors: ZTG leads (966 vs 346). Risk: EYT leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EYT returned 22.20% and ZTG returned 19.90%; over the last year EYT returned 32.88% and ZTG returned 23.96%. Over the last month EYT returned −2.46% and ZTG returned −1.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, EYT has a size of TRY 31.2M with 346 investors, while ZTG has a size of TRY 30.8M with 966 investors. EYT leads in size and ZTG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EYT is 3 out of 7 and that of ZTG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.