OIL vs SFS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OIL (Osmanlı Portföy Altın Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | OIL | SFS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.44% | −1.43% | −1.33% |
| 1 week | −0.65% | −0.84% | −0.68% |
| 1 month | −3.00% | −3.96% | −2.96% |
| 3 months | 3.17% | −2.02% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −3.36% | 2.18% | 2.05% |
| YTD | 7.37% | 20.57% | 17.79% |
| 1 year | 13.75% | 25.65% | 24.45% |
| 3 years | 69.96% | — | 158.82% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the OIL vs SFS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of OIL (Osmanlı Portföy Altın Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, OIL leads in 5 and SFS leads in 5. OIL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: OIL leads (−0.44% vs −1.43%). 1 week: OIL leads (−0.65% vs −0.84%). 1 month: OIL leads (−3.00% vs −3.96%). 3 months: OIL leads (3.17% vs −2.02%). 6 months: SFS leads (2.18% vs −3.36%). YTD: SFS leads (20.57% vs 7.37%). 1 year: SFS leads (25.65% vs 13.75%). Size (TRY): SFS leads (28.7M vs 25.6M). Investors: OIL leads (579 vs 60). Risk: SFS leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, OIL or SFS?
Year to date OIL returned 7.37% and SFS returned 20.57%; over the last year OIL returned 13.75% and SFS returned 25.65%. Over the last month OIL returned −3.00% and SFS returned −3.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, OIL or SFS?
As of November 2, 2026, OIL has a size of TRY 25.6M with 579 investors, while SFS has a size of TRY 28.7M with 60 investors. SFS leads in size and OIL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of OIL and SFS mean?
The CMB risk score of OIL is 6 out of 7 and that of SFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.