EYT vs SFS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EYT | SFS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.38% | −1.43% | −1.33% |
| 1 week | −0.66% | −0.84% | −0.68% |
| 1 month | −2.46% | −3.96% | −2.96% |
| 3 months | 2.10% | −2.02% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 5.88% | 2.18% | 2.05% |
| YTD | 22.20% | 20.57% | 17.79% |
| 1 year | 32.88% | 25.65% | 24.45% |
| 3 years | 63.66% | — | 158.82% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EYT vs SFS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EYT leads in 10 and SFS leads in 0. EYT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EYT leads (−1.38% vs −1.43%). 1 week: EYT leads (−0.66% vs −0.84%). 1 month: EYT leads (−2.46% vs −3.96%). 3 months: EYT leads (2.10% vs −2.02%). 6 months: EYT leads (5.88% vs 2.18%). YTD: EYT leads (22.20% vs 20.57%). 1 year: EYT leads (32.88% vs 25.65%). Size (TRY): EYT leads (31.2M vs 28.7M). Investors: EYT leads (346 vs 60). Risk: EYT leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EYT or SFS?
Year to date EYT returned 22.20% and SFS returned 20.57%; over the last year EYT returned 32.88% and SFS returned 25.65%. Over the last month EYT returned −2.46% and SFS returned −3.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EYT or SFS?
As of November 2, 2026, EYT has a size of TRY 31.2M with 346 investors, while SFS has a size of TRY 28.7M with 60 investors. EYT leads in size and EYT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EYT and SFS mean?
The CMB risk score of EYT is 3 out of 7 and that of SFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.