NAU vs PTN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NAU | PTN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.24% | −1.09% | −0.33% |
| 1 week | −0.97% | −0.94% | −0.95% |
| 1 month | −3.47% | −3.11% | −3.33% |
| 3 months | 1.70% | 2.84% | 1.84% |
| 6 months | −5.85% | −3.56% | −4.05% |
| YTD | −0.72% | 5.92% | 2.85% |
| 1 year | 9.68% | 16.69% | 13.74% |
| 3 years | 93.05% | — | 93.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NAU vs PTN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NAU leads in 3 and PTN leads in 6. NAU is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NAU leads (−0.24% vs −1.09%). 1 week: PTN leads (−0.94% vs −0.97%). 1 month: PTN leads (−3.11% vs −3.47%). 3 months: PTN leads (2.84% vs 1.70%). 6 months: PTN leads (−3.56% vs −5.85%). YTD: PTN leads (5.92% vs −0.72%). 1 year: PTN leads (16.69% vs 9.68%). Size (TRY): NAU leads (1.3B vs 810.4M). Investors: NAU leads (6,977 vs 620).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NAU or PTN?
Year to date NAU returned −0.72% and PTN returned 5.92%; over the last year NAU returned 9.68% and PTN returned 16.69%. Over the last month NAU returned −3.47% and PTN returned −3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NAU or PTN?
As of November 2, 2026, NAU has a size of TRY 1.3B with 6,977 investors, while PTN has a size of TRY 810.4M with 620 investors. NAU leads in size and NAU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NAU and PTN mean?
The CMB risk score of NAU is 6 out of 7 and that of PTN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.