MKG vs PTN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MKG | PTN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.17% | −1.09% | −0.33% |
| 1 week | −0.57% | −0.94% | −0.95% |
| 1 month | −2.74% | −3.11% | −3.33% |
| 3 months | 2.86% | 2.84% | 1.84% |
| 6 months | −3.38% | −3.56% | −4.05% |
| YTD | 3.98% | 5.92% | 2.85% |
| 1 year | 13.69% | 16.69% | 13.74% |
| 3 years | 254.65% | — | 93.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MKG vs PTN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MKG leads in 7 and PTN leads in 2. MKG is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MKG leads (−0.17% vs −1.09%). 1 week: MKG leads (−0.57% vs −0.94%). 1 month: MKG leads (−2.74% vs −3.11%). 3 months: MKG leads (2.86% vs 2.84%). 6 months: MKG leads (−3.38% vs −3.56%). YTD: PTN leads (5.92% vs 3.98%). 1 year: PTN leads (16.69% vs 13.69%). Size (TRY): MKG leads (1.2B vs 810.4M). Investors: MKG leads (6,954 vs 620).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MKG or PTN?
Year to date MKG returned 3.98% and PTN returned 5.92%; over the last year MKG returned 13.69% and PTN returned 16.69%. Over the last month MKG returned −2.74% and PTN returned −3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MKG or PTN?
As of November 2, 2026, MKG has a size of TRY 1.2B with 6,954 investors, while PTN has a size of TRY 810.4M with 620 investors. MKG leads in size and MKG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MKG and PTN mean?
The CMB risk score of MKG is 6 out of 7 and that of PTN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.