MKG vs NAU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MKG | NAU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.17% | −0.24% | −0.33% |
| 1 week | −0.57% | −0.97% | −0.95% |
| 1 month | −2.74% | −3.47% | −3.33% |
| 3 months | 2.86% | 1.70% | 1.84% |
| 6 months | −3.38% | −5.85% | −4.05% |
| YTD | 3.98% | −0.72% | 2.85% |
| 1 year | 13.69% | 9.68% | 13.74% |
| 3 years | 254.65% | 93.05% | 93.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MKG vs NAU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MKG leads in 8 and NAU leads in 2. MKG is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NAU is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MKG leads (−0.17% vs −0.24%). 1 week: MKG leads (−0.57% vs −0.97%). 1 month: MKG leads (−2.74% vs −3.47%). 3 months: MKG leads (2.86% vs 1.70%). 6 months: MKG leads (−3.38% vs −5.85%). YTD: MKG leads (3.98% vs −0.72%). 1 year: MKG leads (13.69% vs 9.68%). 3 years: MKG leads (254.65% vs 93.05%). Size (TRY): NAU leads (1.3B vs 1.2B). Investors: NAU leads (6,977 vs 6,954).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MKG or NAU?
Year to date MKG returned 3.98% and NAU returned −0.72%; over the last year MKG returned 13.69% and NAU returned 9.68%. Over the last month MKG returned −2.74% and NAU returned −3.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MKG or NAU?
As of November 2, 2026, MKG has a size of TRY 1.2B with 6,954 investors, while NAU has a size of TRY 1.3B with 6,977 investors. NAU leads in size and NAU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MKG and NAU mean?
The CMB risk score of MKG is 6 out of 7 and that of NAU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.