FIS vs RZM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RZM (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIS | RZM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.23% | −0.79% | −0.79% |
| 1 week | 0.05% | −0.56% | −0.35% |
| 1 month | 0.33% | −1.78% | −1.64% |
| 3 months | 4.38% | 4.70% | 3.05% |
| 6 months | 11.15% | 11.21% | 9.22% |
| YTD | 26.22% | 31.27% | 25.41% |
| 1 year | 30.26% | 37.02% | 32.69% |
| 3 years | 109.40% | 174.24% | 141.62% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIS vs RZM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RZM (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIS leads in 3 and RZM leads in 8. FIS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; RZM is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIS leads (−0.23% vs −0.79%). 1 week: FIS leads (0.05% vs −0.56%). 1 month: FIS leads (0.33% vs −1.78%). 3 months: RZM leads (4.70% vs 4.38%). 6 months: RZM leads (11.21% vs 11.15%). YTD: RZM leads (31.27% vs 26.22%). 1 year: RZM leads (37.02% vs 30.26%). 3 years: RZM leads (174.24% vs 109.40%). Size (TRY): RZM leads (88.2M vs 29.8M). Investors: RZM leads (2,819 vs 1,196). Risk: RZM leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIS or RZM?
Year to date FIS returned 26.22% and RZM returned 31.27%; over the last year FIS returned 30.26% and RZM returned 37.02%. Over the last month FIS returned 0.33% and RZM returned −1.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIS or RZM?
As of November 2, 2026, FIS has a size of TRY 29.8M with 1,196 investors, while RZM has a size of TRY 88.2M with 2,819 investors. RZM leads in size and RZM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIS and RZM mean?
The CMB risk score of FIS is 4 out of 7 and that of RZM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.