Yatırımcı.AI

FIS vs MHS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FISMHS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIS vs MHS Fund Comparison
MetricFISMHSCategory median
Daily−0.23%−0.68%−0.79%
1 week0.05%−0.26%−0.35%
1 month0.33%−1.63%−1.64%
3 months4.38%2.04%3.05%
6 months11.15%7.52%9.22%
YTD26.22%24.60%25.41%
1 year30.26%29.42%32.69%
3 years109.40%153.59%141.62%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIS vs MHS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIS leads in 7 and MHS leads in 4. FIS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIS leads (−0.23% vs −0.68%). 1 week: FIS leads (0.05% vs −0.26%). 1 month: FIS leads (0.33% vs −1.63%). 3 months: FIS leads (4.38% vs 2.04%). 6 months: FIS leads (11.15% vs 7.52%). YTD: FIS leads (26.22% vs 24.60%). 1 year: FIS leads (30.26% vs 29.42%). 3 years: MHS leads (153.59% vs 109.40%). Size (TRY): MHS leads (79.3M vs 29.8M). Investors: MHS leads (3,043 vs 1,196). Risk: MHS leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIS returned 26.22% and MHS returned 24.60%; over the last year FIS returned 30.26% and MHS returned 29.42%. Over the last month FIS returned 0.33% and MHS returned −1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FIS has a size of TRY 29.8M with 1,196 investors, while MHS has a size of TRY 79.3M with 3,043 investors. MHS leads in size and MHS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIS is 4 out of 7 and that of MHS is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.