BNA vs NHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BNA | NHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.42% | −0.40% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.74% | −0.73% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −3.08% | −3.08% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −3.76% | −4.13% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 3.19% | 2.76% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 13.95% | 12.54% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 255.95% | 249.69% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BNA vs NHA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNA leads in 6 and NHA leads in 5. BNA is a Gold Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHA leads (−0.40% vs −0.42%). 1 week: NHA leads (−0.73% vs −0.74%). 1 month: NHA leads (−3.08% vs −3.08%). 3 months: BNA leads (2.77% vs 2.63%). 6 months: BNA leads (−3.76% vs −4.13%). YTD: BNA leads (3.19% vs 2.76%). 1 year: BNA leads (13.95% vs 12.54%). 3 years: BNA leads (255.95% vs 249.69%). Size (TRY): NHA leads (21B vs 15.3B). Investors: BNA leads (150,282 vs 117,735). Risk: NHA leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BNA or NHA?
Year to date BNA returned 3.19% and NHA returned 2.76%; over the last year BNA returned 13.95% and NHA returned 12.54%. Over the last month BNA returned −3.08% and NHA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNA or NHA?
As of November 2, 2026, BNA has a size of TRY 15.3B with 150,282 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21B with 117,735 investors. NHA leads in size and BNA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNA and NHA mean?
The CMB risk score of BNA is 7 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.