AFO vs NHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AFO | NHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.18% | −0.40% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.75% | −0.73% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −3.13% | −3.08% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.85% | 2.63% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −4.29% | −4.13% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 1.86% | 2.76% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 12.03% | 12.54% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 223.07% | 249.69% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AFO vs NHA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFO leads in 2 and NHA leads in 8. AFO is a Gold Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AFO leads (−0.18% vs −0.40%). 1 week: NHA leads (−0.73% vs −0.75%). 1 month: NHA leads (−3.08% vs −3.13%). 3 months: AFO leads (2.85% vs 2.63%). 6 months: NHA leads (−4.13% vs −4.29%). YTD: NHA leads (2.76% vs 1.86%). 1 year: NHA leads (12.54% vs 12.03%). 3 years: NHA leads (249.69% vs 223.07%). Size (TRY): NHA leads (21B vs 17.3B). Investors: NHA leads (117,735 vs 77,242).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AFO or NHA?
Year to date AFO returned 1.86% and NHA returned 2.76%; over the last year AFO returned 12.03% and NHA returned 12.54%. Over the last month AFO returned −3.13% and NHA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFO or NHA?
As of November 2, 2026, AFO has a size of TRY 17.3B with 77,242 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21B with 117,735 investors. NHA leads in size and NHA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFO and NHA mean?
The CMB risk score of AFO is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.