Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs ZCD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NZTZCD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NZT vs ZCD Fund Comparison
MetricNZTZCDCategory median
Daily0.27%−0.81%0.16%
1 week0.65%−2.87%0.46%
1 month3.00%−4.17%1.10%
3 months9.53%−13.51%3.53%
6 months21.09%−8.89%8.53%
YTD36.75%−6.25%16.18%
1 year45.25%−2.05%19.94%
3 years259.31%165.14%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NZT vs ZCD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NZT leads in 9 and ZCD leads in 2. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZCD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.27% vs −0.81%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.65% vs −2.87%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.00% vs −4.17%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.53% vs −13.51%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.09% vs −8.89%). YTD: NZT leads (36.75% vs −6.25%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.25% vs −2.05%). 3 years: NZT leads (259.31% vs 165.14%). Size (TRY): ZCD leads (1B vs 1B). Investors: ZCD leads (359 vs 290). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NZT returned 36.75% and ZCD returned −6.25%; over the last year NZT returned 45.25% and ZCD returned −2.05%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.00% and ZCD returned −4.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 1B with 290 investors, while ZCD has a size of TRY 1B with 359 investors. ZCD leads in size and ZCD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of ZCD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.