GUK vs NZT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | NZT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −7.20% | 0.27% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | −6.63% | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −15.20% | 3.00% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | −8.36% | 9.53% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | −24.43% | 21.09% | 8.53% |
| YTD | −25.86% | 36.75% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | — | 45.25% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 259.31% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs NZT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GUK leads in 2 and NZT leads in 7. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.27% vs −7.20%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.65% vs −6.63%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.00% vs −15.20%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.53% vs −8.36%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.09% vs −24.43%). YTD: NZT leads (36.75% vs −25.86%). Size (TRY): GUK leads (1B vs 1B). Investors: GUK leads (2,292 vs 290). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or NZT?
Year to date GUK returned −25.86% and NZT returned 36.75%; over the last year GUK returned — and NZT returned 45.25%. Over the last month GUK returned −15.20% and NZT returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or NZT?
As of November 2, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1B with 2,292 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 1B with 290 investors. GUK leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and NZT mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.