Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs YKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) side by side.

NZTYKS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NZT vs YKS Fund Comparison
MetricNZTYKSCategory median
Daily0.27%0.10%0.16%
1 week0.65%0.51%0.46%
1 month3.00%3.05%1.10%
3 months9.53%10.27%3.53%
6 months21.09%18.25%8.53%
YTD36.75%30.31%16.18%
1 year45.25%39.09%19.94%
3 years259.31%205.43%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NZT vs YKS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NZT leads in 7 and YKS leads in 3. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.27% vs 0.10%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.65% vs 0.51%). 1 month: YKS leads (3.05% vs 3.00%). 3 months: YKS leads (10.27% vs 9.53%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.09% vs 18.25%). YTD: NZT leads (36.75% vs 30.31%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.25% vs 39.09%). 3 years: NZT leads (259.31% vs 205.43%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (1B vs 992.4M). Investors: YKS leads (434 vs 290).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NZT returned 36.75% and YKS returned 30.31%; over the last year NZT returned 45.25% and YKS returned 39.09%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.00% and YKS returned 3.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 1B with 290 investors, while YKS has a size of TRY 992.4M with 434 investors. NZT leads in size and YKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of YKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.