Yatırımcı.AI

GJB vs PFO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PFO (Phillip Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GJBPFO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GJB vs PFO Fund Comparison
MetricGJBPFOCategory median
Daily−1.98%0.60%−1.33%
1 week−0.96%−0.63%−0.68%
1 month−7.28%0.39%−2.96%
3 months−6.02%−4.00%0.00%
6 months−5.69%−2.46%2.05%
YTD9.66%11.02%17.79%
1 year24.57%19.54%24.45%
3 years138.66%42.43%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GJB vs PFO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PFO (Phillip Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GJB leads in 3 and PFO leads in 8. GJB is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PFO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PFO leads (0.60% vs −1.98%). 1 week: PFO leads (−0.63% vs −0.96%). 1 month: PFO leads (0.39% vs −7.28%). 3 months: PFO leads (−4.00% vs −6.02%). 6 months: PFO leads (−2.46% vs −5.69%). YTD: PFO leads (11.02% vs 9.66%). 1 year: GJB leads (24.57% vs 19.54%). 3 years: GJB leads (138.66% vs 42.43%). Size (TRY): PFO leads (66M vs 58.1M). Investors: GJB leads (732 vs 244). Risk: PFO leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GJB returned 9.66% and PFO returned 11.02%; over the last year GJB returned 24.57% and PFO returned 19.54%. Over the last month GJB returned −7.28% and PFO returned 0.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GJB has a size of TRY 58.1M with 732 investors, while PFO has a size of TRY 66M with 244 investors. PFO leads in size and GJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GJB is 5 out of 7 and that of PFO is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.