GAG vs RRA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GAG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GAG | RRA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.53% | 0.70% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 2.18% | 3.21% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 6.27% | 9.88% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 13.06% | 21.54% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 20.32% | 38.48% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 24.01% | 47.72% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 101.40% | — | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GAG vs RRA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GAG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GAG leads in 1 and RRA leads in 9. GAG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RRA leads (0.30% vs 0.20%). 1 week: RRA leads (0.70% vs 0.53%). 1 month: RRA leads (3.21% vs 2.18%). 3 months: RRA leads (9.88% vs 6.27%). 6 months: RRA leads (21.54% vs 13.06%). YTD: RRA leads (38.48% vs 20.32%). 1 year: RRA leads (47.72% vs 24.01%). Size (TRY): RRA leads (659.2M vs 656.9M). Investors: GAG leads (172 vs 141). Risk: RRA leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GAG or RRA?
Year to date GAG returned 20.32% and RRA returned 38.48%; over the last year GAG returned 24.01% and RRA returned 47.72%. Over the last month GAG returned 2.18% and RRA returned 3.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GAG or RRA?
As of November 2, 2026, GAG has a size of TRY 656.9M with 172 investors, while RRA has a size of TRY 659.2M with 141 investors. RRA leads in size and GAG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GAG and RRA mean?
The CMB risk score of GAG is 5 out of 7 and that of RRA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.