FDV vs KDO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and KDO (İş Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FDV | KDO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 1.24% | — | 2.25% |
| Daily | −1.37% | 0.54% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | −0.47% | 0.44% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −1.85% | 1.45% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 3.12% | 3.28% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 14.24% | 7.77% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 40.88% | 13.37% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 46.12% | — | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 273.23% | — | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FDV vs KDO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and KDO (İş Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, FDV leads in 3 and KDO leads in 5. FDV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KDO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KDO leads (0.54% vs −1.37%). 1 week: KDO leads (0.44% vs −0.47%). 1 month: KDO leads (1.45% vs −1.85%). 3 months: KDO leads (3.28% vs 3.12%). 6 months: FDV leads (14.24% vs 7.77%). YTD: FDV leads (40.88% vs 13.37%). Size (TRY): FDV leads (1.5B vs 1.4B). Investors: KDO leads (549 vs 1).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FDV or KDO?
Year to date FDV returned 40.88% and KDO returned 13.37%; over the last year FDV returned 46.12% and KDO returned —. Over the last month FDV returned −1.85% and KDO returned 1.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FDV or KDO?
As of November 2, 2026, FDV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1 investors, while KDO has a size of TRY 1.4B with 549 investors. FDV leads in size and KDO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FDV and KDO mean?
The CMB risk score of FDV is 4 out of 7 and that of KDO is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.