Yatırımcı.AI

ACU vs FDV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) side by side.

ACUFDV
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ACU vs FDV Fund Comparison
MetricACUFDVCategory median
Today (est.)—0.94%1.59%
Daily0.19%−1.37%0.16%
1 week0.52%−0.47%0.46%
1 month2.14%−1.85%1.10%
3 months6.49%3.12%3.53%
6 months13.34%14.24%8.53%
YTD20.96%40.88%16.18%
1 year24.95%46.12%19.94%
3 years113.70%273.23%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 15:40.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ACU vs FDV Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ACU leads in 6 and FDV leads in 5. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FDV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ACU leads (0.19% vs −1.37%). 1 week: ACU leads (0.52% vs −0.47%). 1 month: ACU leads (2.14% vs −1.85%). 3 months: ACU leads (6.49% vs 3.12%). 6 months: FDV leads (14.24% vs 13.34%). YTD: FDV leads (40.88% vs 20.96%). 1 year: FDV leads (46.12% vs 24.95%). 3 years: FDV leads (273.23% vs 113.70%). Size (TRY): ACU leads (1.5B vs 1.5B). Investors: ACU leads (115 vs 1). Risk: FDV leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ACU returned 20.96% and FDV returned 40.88%; over the last year ACU returned 24.95% and FDV returned 46.12%. Over the last month ACU returned 2.14% and FDV returned −1.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 115 investors, while FDV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1 investors. ACU leads in size and ACU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of FDV is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.