CHU vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHU | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.74% | −0.82% | −0.61% |
| 1 week | −0.45% | −0.93% | −0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.92% | −1.69% | −0.85% |
| 3 months | 4.23% | 2.66% | 4.07% |
| 6 months | 9.65% | 6.96% | 8.79% |
| YTD | 20.59% | 13.63% | 18.66% |
| 1 year | 27.86% | 22.06% | 28.02% |
| 3 years | 139.30% | 128.83% | 141.97% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHU vs MHZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHU leads in 8 and MHZ leads in 2. CHU is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CHU leads (−0.74% vs −0.82%). 1 week: CHU leads (−0.45% vs −0.93%). 1 month: CHU leads (−0.92% vs −1.69%). 3 months: CHU leads (4.23% vs 2.66%). 6 months: CHU leads (9.65% vs 6.96%). YTD: CHU leads (20.59% vs 13.63%). 1 year: CHU leads (27.86% vs 22.06%). 3 years: CHU leads (139.30% vs 128.83%). Size (TRY): MHZ leads (704.3M vs 411.4M). Investors: MHZ leads (128,535 vs 66,476).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHU or MHZ?
Year to date CHU returned 20.59% and MHZ returned 13.63%; over the last year CHU returned 27.86% and MHZ returned 22.06%. Over the last month CHU returned −0.92% and MHZ returned −1.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHU or MHZ?
As of November 2, 2026, CHU has a size of TRY 411.4M with 66,476 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 704.3M with 128,535 investors. MHZ leads in size and MHZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHU and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of CHU is 4 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.