Yatırımcı.AI

CHU vs HEC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HEC (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

CHUHEC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHU vs HEC Fund Comparison
MetricCHUHECCategory median
Daily−0.74%−0.58%−0.61%
1 week−0.45%−0.32%−0.42%
1 month−0.92%−0.53%−0.85%
3 months4.23%4.68%4.07%
6 months9.65%8.76%8.79%
YTD20.59%19.89%18.66%
1 year27.86%29.28%28.02%
3 years139.30%160.71%141.97%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHU vs HEC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HEC (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHU leads in 2 and HEC leads in 8. CHU is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HEC is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HEC leads (−0.58% vs −0.74%). 1 week: HEC leads (−0.32% vs −0.45%). 1 month: HEC leads (−0.53% vs −0.92%). 3 months: HEC leads (4.68% vs 4.23%). 6 months: CHU leads (9.65% vs 8.76%). YTD: CHU leads (20.59% vs 19.89%). 1 year: HEC leads (29.28% vs 27.86%). 3 years: HEC leads (160.71% vs 139.30%). Size (TRY): HEC leads (516.9M vs 411.4M). Investors: HEC leads (71,226 vs 66,476).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHU returned 20.59% and HEC returned 19.89%; over the last year CHU returned 27.86% and HEC returned 29.28%. Over the last month CHU returned −0.92% and HEC returned −0.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CHU has a size of TRY 411.4M with 66,476 investors, while HEC has a size of TRY 516.9M with 71,226 investors. HEC leads in size and HEC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHU is 4 out of 7 and that of HEC is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.