Yatırımcı.AI

BGL vs NHA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BGLNHA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BGL vs NHA Fund Comparison
MetricBGLNHACategory median
Daily−0.43%−0.40%−0.32%
1 week−0.56%−0.73%−0.74%
1 month−2.37%−3.08%−3.05%
3 months2.89%2.63%2.83%
6 months−4.18%−4.13%−4.12%
YTD−2.84%2.76%2.06%
1 year7.50%12.54%12.48%
3 years234.33%249.69%236.27%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BGL vs NHA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 5 and NHA leads in 5. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NHA leads (−0.40% vs −0.43%). 1 week: BGL leads (−0.56% vs −0.73%). 1 month: BGL leads (−2.37% vs −3.08%). 3 months: BGL leads (2.89% vs 2.63%). 6 months: NHA leads (−4.13% vs −4.18%). YTD: NHA leads (2.76% vs −2.84%). 1 year: NHA leads (12.54% vs 7.50%). 3 years: NHA leads (249.69% vs 234.33%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (65B vs 21B). Investors: BGL leads (769,295 vs 117,735).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BGL returned −2.84% and NHA returned 2.76%; over the last year BGL returned 7.50% and NHA returned 12.54%. Over the last month BGL returned −2.37% and NHA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 65B with 769,295 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21B with 117,735 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.