Yatırımcı.AI

BGL vs OJK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (QNB Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

BGLOJK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BGL vs OJK Fund Comparison
MetricBGLOJKCategory median
Daily−0.43%−0.13%−0.32%
1 week−0.56%−0.59%−0.74%
1 month−2.37%−2.70%−3.05%
3 months2.89%3.34%2.83%
6 months−4.18%−2.35%−4.12%
YTD−2.84%5.75%2.06%
1 year7.50%16.46%12.48%
3 years234.33%259.81%236.27%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BGL vs OJK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (QNB Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 4 and OJK leads in 6. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; OJK is a Gold Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OJK leads (−0.13% vs −0.43%). 1 week: BGL leads (−0.56% vs −0.59%). 1 month: BGL leads (−2.37% vs −2.70%). 3 months: OJK leads (3.34% vs 2.89%). 6 months: OJK leads (−2.35% vs −4.18%). YTD: OJK leads (5.75% vs −2.84%). 1 year: OJK leads (16.46% vs 7.50%). 3 years: OJK leads (259.81% vs 234.33%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (65B vs 42.7B). Investors: BGL leads (769,295 vs 26,131).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BGL returned −2.84% and OJK returned 5.75%; over the last year BGL returned 7.50% and OJK returned 16.46%. Over the last month BGL returned −2.37% and OJK returned −2.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 65B with 769,295 investors, while OJK has a size of TRY 42.7B with 26,131 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of OJK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.