BGL vs BNA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BGL | BNA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.43% | −0.42% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.56% | −0.74% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −2.37% | −3.08% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.89% | 2.77% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −4.18% | −3.76% | −4.12% |
| YTD | −2.84% | 3.19% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 7.50% | 13.95% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 234.33% | 255.95% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BGL vs BNA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BNA (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BGL leads in 6 and BNA leads in 5. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; BNA is a Gold Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BNA leads (−0.42% vs −0.43%). 1 week: BGL leads (−0.56% vs −0.74%). 1 month: BGL leads (−2.37% vs −3.08%). 3 months: BGL leads (2.89% vs 2.77%). 6 months: BNA leads (−3.76% vs −4.18%). YTD: BNA leads (3.19% vs −2.84%). 1 year: BNA leads (13.95% vs 7.50%). 3 years: BNA leads (255.95% vs 234.33%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (65B vs 15.3B). Investors: BGL leads (769,295 vs 150,282). Risk: BGL leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BGL or BNA?
Year to date BGL returned −2.84% and BNA returned 3.19%; over the last year BGL returned 7.50% and BNA returned 13.95%. Over the last month BGL returned −2.37% and BNA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BGL or BNA?
As of November 2, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 65B with 769,295 investors, while BNA has a size of TRY 15.3B with 150,282 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BGL and BNA mean?
The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of BNA is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.