Yatırımcı.AI

RPT vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

RPTZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RPT vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricRPTZMTCategory median
Today (est.)3.90%—2.41%
Daily0.27%0.51%0.16%
1 week0.67%0.47%0.46%
1 month3.01%1.79%1.10%
3 months8.95%3.05%3.53%
6 months20.45%8.55%8.53%
YTD36.27%14.24%16.18%
1 year44.80%19.76%19.94%
3 years263.33%112.87%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:38.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RPT vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RPT leads in 7 and ZMT leads in 3. RPT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZMT leads (0.51% vs 0.27%). 1 week: RPT leads (0.67% vs 0.47%). 1 month: RPT leads (3.01% vs 1.79%). 3 months: RPT leads (8.95% vs 3.05%). 6 months: RPT leads (20.45% vs 8.55%). YTD: RPT leads (36.27% vs 14.24%). 1 year: RPT leads (44.80% vs 19.76%). 3 years: RPT leads (263.33% vs 112.87%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: ZMT leads (226 vs 122).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RPT returned 36.27% and ZMT returned 14.24%; over the last year RPT returned 44.80% and ZMT returned 19.76%. Over the last month RPT returned 3.01% and ZMT returned 1.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, RPT has a size of TRY 1.5B with 122 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 226 investors. ZMT leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RPT is 1 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.