TPP vs ZMT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TPP | ZMT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.13% | 0.51% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −2.97% | 1.79% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | −1.25% | 3.05% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 9.15% | 8.55% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 23.74% | 14.24% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 45.74% | 19.76% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 240.51% | 112.87% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TPP vs ZMT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, TPP leads in 7 and ZMT leads in 3. TPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZMT leads (0.51% vs −1.13%). 1 week: TPP leads (0.53% vs 0.47%). 1 month: ZMT leads (1.79% vs −2.97%). 3 months: ZMT leads (3.05% vs −1.25%). 6 months: TPP leads (9.15% vs 8.55%). YTD: TPP leads (23.74% vs 14.24%). 1 year: TPP leads (45.74% vs 19.76%). 3 years: TPP leads (240.51% vs 112.87%). Size (TRY): TPP leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: TPP leads (324 vs 226).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, TPP or ZMT?
Year to date TPP returned 23.74% and ZMT returned 14.24%; over the last year TPP returned 45.74% and ZMT returned 19.76%. Over the last month TPP returned −2.97% and ZMT returned 1.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, TPP or ZMT?
As of November 2, 2026, TPP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 324 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 226 investors. TPP leads in size and TPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of TPP and ZMT mean?
The CMB risk score of TPP is — out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.