Yatırımcı.AI

RAF vs RDT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) side by side.

RAFRDT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RAF vs RDT Fund Comparison
MetricRAFRDTCategory median
Today (est.)1.44%—2.41%
Daily−1.97%−1.56%0.16%
1 week−1.29%−1.76%0.46%
1 month−6.43%−3.41%1.10%
3 months−3.54%3.20%3.53%
6 months−1.08%−4.71%8.53%
YTD21.69%−17.87%16.18%
1 year31.60%−11.46%19.94%
3 years124.78%—103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:38.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RAF vs RDT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RAF leads in 5 and RDT leads in 5. RAF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RDT leads (−1.56% vs −1.97%). 1 week: RAF leads (−1.29% vs −1.76%). 1 month: RDT leads (−3.41% vs −6.43%). 3 months: RDT leads (3.20% vs −3.54%). 6 months: RAF leads (−1.08% vs −4.71%). YTD: RAF leads (21.69% vs −17.87%). 1 year: RAF leads (31.60% vs −11.46%). Size (TRY): RAF leads (75.5M vs 72.4M). Investors: RDT leads (42 vs 13). Risk: RDT leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RAF returned 21.69% and RDT returned −17.87%; over the last year RAF returned 31.60% and RDT returned −11.46%. Over the last month RAF returned −6.43% and RDT returned −3.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, RAF has a size of TRY 75.5M with 13 investors, while RDT has a size of TRY 72.4M with 42 investors. RAF leads in size and RDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RAF is 6 out of 7 and that of RDT is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.