Yatırımcı.AI

PTS vs YMD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and YMD (Yapı Kredi Portföy Maslak Serbest (Döviz- ABD Doları) Fon) side by side.

PTSYMD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PTS vs YMD Fund Comparison
MetricPTSYMDCategory median
Daily0.29%0.17%0.16%
1 week0.67%0.50%0.46%
1 month3.04%1.99%1.10%
3 months9.61%6.05%3.53%
6 months21.48%12.75%8.53%
YTD37.30%19.58%16.18%
1 year45.83%23.11%19.94%
3 years—101.31%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PTS vs YMD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and YMD (Yapı Kredi Portföy Maslak Serbest (Döviz- ABD Doları) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PTS leads in 8 and YMD leads in 1. PTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YMD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PTS leads (0.29% vs 0.17%). 1 week: PTS leads (0.67% vs 0.50%). 1 month: PTS leads (3.04% vs 1.99%). 3 months: PTS leads (9.61% vs 6.05%). 6 months: PTS leads (21.48% vs 12.75%). YTD: PTS leads (37.30% vs 19.58%). 1 year: PTS leads (45.83% vs 23.11%). Size (TRY): PTS leads (7.7B vs 7.7B). Investors: YMD leads (1,451 vs 980).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PTS returned 37.30% and YMD returned 19.58%; over the last year PTS returned 45.83% and YMD returned 23.11%. Over the last month PTS returned 3.04% and YMD returned 1.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, PTS has a size of TRY 7.7B with 980 investors, while YMD has a size of TRY 7.7B with 1,451 investors. PTS leads in size and YMD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PTS is 2 out of 7 and that of YMD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.