PTS vs VMV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and VMV (Vega Portföy Mavi Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PTS | VMV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.27% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 3.04% | 2.96% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 9.61% | 9.62% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 21.48% | 20.95% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 37.30% | 37.47% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 45.83% | 46.67% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 62.29% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PTS vs VMV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and VMV (Vega Portföy Mavi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PTS leads in 5 and VMV leads in 4. PTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VMV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Vega Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTS leads (0.29% vs 0.27%). 1 week: PTS leads (0.67% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PTS leads (3.04% vs 2.96%). 3 months: VMV leads (9.62% vs 9.61%). 6 months: PTS leads (21.48% vs 20.95%). YTD: VMV leads (37.47% vs 37.30%). 1 year: VMV leads (46.67% vs 45.83%). Size (TRY): VMV leads (7.8B vs 7.7B). Investors: PTS leads (980 vs 96).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PTS or VMV?
Year to date PTS returned 37.30% and VMV returned 37.47%; over the last year PTS returned 45.83% and VMV returned 46.67%. Over the last month PTS returned 3.04% and VMV returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PTS or VMV?
As of November 2, 2026, PTS has a size of TRY 7.7B with 980 investors, while VMV has a size of TRY 7.8B with 96 investors. VMV leads in size and PTS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PTS and VMV mean?
The CMB risk score of PTS is 2 out of 7 and that of VMV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.