Yatırımcı.AI

NTB vs ZP9 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NTB (Azimut Portföy Avşar Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

NTBZP9
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NTB vs ZP9 Fund Comparison
MetricNTBZP9Category median
Today (est.)2.70%—2.25%
Daily−2.84%0.55%0.16%
1 week−3.53%0.44%0.46%
1 month−7.49%0.99%1.10%
3 months−5.05%2.92%3.53%
6 months−7.46%7.01%8.53%
YTD14.18%12.14%16.18%
1 year13.08%16.98%19.94%
3 years69.12%97.59%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 17:26.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NTB vs ZP9 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NTB (Azimut Portföy Avşar Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NTB leads in 2 and ZP9 leads in 8. NTB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZP9 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZP9 leads (0.55% vs −2.84%). 1 week: ZP9 leads (0.44% vs −3.53%). 1 month: ZP9 leads (0.99% vs −7.49%). 3 months: ZP9 leads (2.92% vs −5.05%). 6 months: ZP9 leads (7.01% vs −7.46%). YTD: NTB leads (14.18% vs 12.14%). 1 year: ZP9 leads (16.98% vs 13.08%). 3 years: ZP9 leads (97.59% vs 69.12%). Size (TRY): NTB leads (2.9B vs 2.7B). Investors: ZP9 leads (764 vs 1).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NTB returned 14.18% and ZP9 returned 12.14%; over the last year NTB returned 13.08% and ZP9 returned 16.98%. Over the last month NTB returned −7.49% and ZP9 returned 0.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, NTB has a size of TRY 2.9B with 1 investors, while ZP9 has a size of TRY 2.7B with 764 investors. NTB leads in size and ZP9 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NTB is 6 out of 7 and that of ZP9 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.