Yatırımcı.AI

KRS vs ULH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

KRSULH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KRS vs ULH Fund Comparison
MetricKRSULHCategory median
Daily−0.69%−0.93%0.16%
1 week−0.21%−0.61%0.46%
1 month−0.15%−3.21%1.10%
3 months4.27%3.89%3.53%
6 months8.70%4.38%8.53%
YTD14.60%16.06%16.18%
1 year17.27%19.01%19.94%
3 years133.62%200.30%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KRS vs ULH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KRS leads in 7 and ULH leads in 4. KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (−0.69% vs −0.93%). 1 week: KRS leads (−0.21% vs −0.61%). 1 month: KRS leads (−0.15% vs −3.21%). 3 months: KRS leads (4.27% vs 3.89%). 6 months: KRS leads (8.70% vs 4.38%). YTD: ULH leads (16.06% vs 14.60%). 1 year: ULH leads (19.01% vs 17.27%). 3 years: ULH leads (200.30% vs 133.62%). Size (TRY): ULH leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: KRS leads (774 vs 210). Risk: KRS leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KRS returned 14.60% and ULH returned 16.06%; over the last year KRS returned 17.27% and ULH returned 19.01%. Over the last month KRS returned −0.15% and ULH returned −3.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KRS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 774 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 210 investors. ULH leads in size and KRS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KRS is 5 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.