Yatırımcı.AI

KLS vs YLZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YLZ (Bulls Portföy Yıldız Pazar Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate YLZ in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (November 2, 2026). YLZ fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

KLSYLZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KLS vs YLZ Fund Comparison
MetricKLSYLZCategory median
Daily−0.36%0.57%0.16%
1 week−0.75%1.35%0.46%
1 month−3.53%−92.19%1.10%
3 months−4.78%−85.57%3.53%
6 months−4.28%−86.49%8.53%
YTD−6.14%−45.81%16.18%
1 year−3.91%—19.94%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KLS vs YLZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YLZ (Bulls Portföy Yıldız Pazar Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KLS leads in 4 and YLZ leads in 4. KLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; YLZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Bulls Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YLZ leads (0.57% vs −0.36%). 1 week: YLZ leads (1.35% vs −0.75%). 1 month: KLS leads (−3.53% vs −92.19%). 3 months: KLS leads (−4.78% vs −85.57%). 6 months: KLS leads (−4.28% vs −86.49%). YTD: KLS leads (−6.14% vs −45.81%). Size (TRY): YLZ leads (259.5K vs 203.7K). Investors: YLZ leads (10 vs 1).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KLS returned −6.14% and YLZ returned −45.81%; over the last year KLS returned −3.91% and YLZ returned —. Over the last month KLS returned −3.53% and YLZ returned −92.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KLS has a size of TRY 203.7K with 1 investors, while YLZ has a size of TRY 259.5K with 10 investors. YLZ leads in size and YLZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KLS is 6 out of 7 and that of YLZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.