KLI vs PBK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and PBK (Astra Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KLI | PBK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 2.92% | 2.39% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 9.39% | 4.05% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 21.18% | 8.70% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 36.91% | 14.74% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | — | 19.43% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 101.00% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KLI vs PBK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and PBK (Astra Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KLI leads in 6 and PBK leads in 3. KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PBK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PBK leads (0.34% vs 0.27%). 1 week: PBK leads (0.65% vs 0.64%). 1 month: KLI leads (2.92% vs 2.39%). 3 months: KLI leads (9.39% vs 4.05%). 6 months: KLI leads (21.18% vs 8.70%). YTD: KLI leads (36.91% vs 14.74%). Size (TRY): PBK leads (77.5M vs 77.2M). Investors: KLI leads (129 vs 83). Risk: KLI leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KLI or PBK?
Year to date KLI returned 36.91% and PBK returned 14.74%; over the last year KLI returned — and PBK returned 19.43%. Over the last month KLI returned 2.92% and PBK returned 2.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KLI or PBK?
As of November 2, 2026, KLI has a size of TRY 77.2M with 129 investors, while PBK has a size of TRY 77.5M with 83 investors. PBK leads in size and KLI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KLI and PBK mean?
The CMB risk score of KLI is 2 out of 7 and that of PBK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.