KCL vs RRP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KCL | RRP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.70% | 0.29% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | −1.28% | 0.99% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | −3.10% | 3.23% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | −4.11% | 9.51% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | −0.83% | 20.87% | 9.17% |
| YTD | 17.98% | 35.93% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | 21.76% | 43.99% | 30.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KCL vs RRP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KCL leads in 2 and RRP leads in 8. KCL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRP is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RRP leads (0.29% vs −1.70%). 1 week: RRP leads (0.99% vs −1.28%). 1 month: RRP leads (3.23% vs −3.10%). 3 months: RRP leads (9.51% vs −4.11%). 6 months: RRP leads (20.87% vs −0.83%). YTD: RRP leads (35.93% vs 17.98%). 1 year: RRP leads (43.99% vs 21.76%). Size (TRY): KCL leads (9.8M vs 3.8M). Investors: KCL leads (125 vs 103). Risk: RRP leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KCL or RRP?
Year to date KCL returned 17.98% and RRP returned 35.93%; over the last year KCL returned 21.76% and RRP returned 43.99%. Over the last month KCL returned −3.10% and RRP returned 3.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KCL or RRP?
As of November 2, 2026, KCL has a size of TRY 9.8M with 125 investors, while RRP has a size of TRY 3.8M with 103 investors. KCL leads in size and KCL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KCL and RRP mean?
The CMB risk score of KCL is 6 out of 7 and that of RRP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.