FAK vs KCL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FAK (Fonmap Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FAK | KCL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 0.71% | — | 1.15% |
| Daily | −1.94% | −1.70% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | −1.64% | −1.28% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | −3.65% | −3.10% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | 0.83% | −4.11% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | −10.44% | −0.83% | 9.17% |
| YTD | −19.68% | 17.98% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | −0.96% | 21.76% | 30.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FAK vs KCL Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FAK (Fonmap Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FAK leads in 3 and KCL leads in 6. FAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KCL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KCL leads (−1.70% vs −1.94%). 1 week: KCL leads (−1.28% vs −1.64%). 1 month: KCL leads (−3.10% vs −3.65%). 3 months: FAK leads (0.83% vs −4.11%). 6 months: KCL leads (−0.83% vs −10.44%). YTD: KCL leads (17.98% vs −19.68%). 1 year: KCL leads (21.76% vs −0.96%). Size (TRY): FAK leads (10M vs 9.8M). Investors: FAK leads (261 vs 125).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FAK or KCL?
Year to date FAK returned −19.68% and KCL returned 17.98%; over the last year FAK returned −0.96% and KCL returned 21.76%. Over the last month FAK returned −3.65% and KCL returned −3.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FAK or KCL?
As of November 2, 2026, FAK has a size of TRY 10M with 261 investors, while KCL has a size of TRY 9.8M with 125 investors. FAK leads in size and FAK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FAK and KCL mean?
The CMB risk score of FAK is 6 out of 7 and that of KCL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.