Yatırımcı.AI

ITP vs YAK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) and YAK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Karma Fon) side by side.

ITPYAK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ITP vs YAK Fund Comparison
MetricITPYAKCategory median
Daily−2.50%−0.81%−0.85%
1 week−0.39%−0.57%−0.48%
1 month−3.56%−1.80%−1.96%
3 months4.79%1.45%1.89%
6 months17.47%5.28%8.31%
YTD33.14%19.33%19.33%
1 year34.17%28.22%24.17%
3 years261.45%134.30%177.07%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ITP vs YAK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) and YAK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ITP leads in 6 and YAK leads in 5. ITP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YAK is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YAK leads (−0.81% vs −2.50%). 1 week: ITP leads (−0.39% vs −0.57%). 1 month: YAK leads (−1.80% vs −3.56%). 3 months: ITP leads (4.79% vs 1.45%). 6 months: ITP leads (17.47% vs 5.28%). YTD: ITP leads (33.14% vs 19.33%). 1 year: ITP leads (34.17% vs 28.22%). 3 years: ITP leads (261.45% vs 134.30%). Size (TRY): YAK leads (1.1B vs 989.7M). Investors: YAK leads (106,968 vs 10,418). Risk: YAK leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ITP returned 33.14% and YAK returned 19.33%; over the last year ITP returned 34.17% and YAK returned 28.22%. Over the last month ITP returned −3.56% and YAK returned −1.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ITP has a size of TRY 989.7M with 10,418 investors, while YAK has a size of TRY 1.1B with 106,968 investors. YAK leads in size and YAK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ITP is 6 out of 7 and that of YAK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.