Yatırımcı.AI

IKP vs ITP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) side by side.

IKPITP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IKP vs ITP Fund Comparison
MetricIKPITPCategory median
Daily−0.54%−2.50%−0.85%
1 week1.80%−0.39%−0.48%
1 month−2.97%−3.56%−1.96%
3 months−4.75%4.79%1.89%
6 months−0.86%17.47%8.31%
YTD25.26%33.14%19.33%
1 year27.32%34.17%24.17%
3 years217.23%261.45%177.07%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IKP vs ITP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IKP leads in 4 and ITP leads in 6. IKP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ITP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IKP leads (−0.54% vs −2.50%). 1 week: IKP leads (1.80% vs −0.39%). 1 month: IKP leads (−2.97% vs −3.56%). 3 months: ITP leads (4.79% vs −4.75%). 6 months: ITP leads (17.47% vs −0.86%). YTD: ITP leads (33.14% vs 25.26%). 1 year: ITP leads (34.17% vs 27.32%). 3 years: ITP leads (261.45% vs 217.23%). Size (TRY): ITP leads (989.7M vs 900.2M). Investors: IKP leads (10,988 vs 10,418).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IKP returned 25.26% and ITP returned 33.14%; over the last year IKP returned 27.32% and ITP returned 34.17%. Over the last month IKP returned −2.97% and ITP returned −3.56%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IKP has a size of TRY 900.2M with 10,988 investors, while ITP has a size of TRY 989.7M with 10,418 investors. ITP leads in size and IKP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IKP is 6 out of 7 and that of ITP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.