Yatırımcı.AI

IPJ vs ITP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPJ (İş Portföy Elektrikli Araçlar Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) side by side.

IPJITP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPJ vs ITP Fund Comparison
MetricIPJITPCategory median
Daily−3.46%−2.50%−0.85%
1 week−0.23%−0.39%−0.48%
1 month−7.55%−3.56%−1.96%
3 months−5.11%4.79%1.89%
6 months−4.07%17.47%8.31%
YTD19.02%33.14%19.33%
1 year23.84%34.17%24.17%
3 years160.13%261.45%177.07%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPJ vs ITP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPJ (İş Portföy Elektrikli Araçlar Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IPJ leads in 3 and ITP leads in 7. IPJ is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ITP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ITP leads (−2.50% vs −3.46%). 1 week: IPJ leads (−0.23% vs −0.39%). 1 month: ITP leads (−3.56% vs −7.55%). 3 months: ITP leads (4.79% vs −5.11%). 6 months: ITP leads (17.47% vs −4.07%). YTD: ITP leads (33.14% vs 19.02%). 1 year: ITP leads (34.17% vs 23.84%). 3 years: ITP leads (261.45% vs 160.13%). Size (TRY): IPJ leads (1.1B vs 989.7M). Investors: IPJ leads (16,558 vs 10,418).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPJ returned 19.02% and ITP returned 33.14%; over the last year IPJ returned 23.84% and ITP returned 34.17%. Over the last month IPJ returned −7.55% and ITP returned −3.56%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IPJ has a size of TRY 1.1B with 16,558 investors, while ITP has a size of TRY 989.7M with 10,418 investors. IPJ leads in size and IPJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPJ is 6 out of 7 and that of ITP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.