ICC vs MAD Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICC (TEB Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and MAD (Meksa Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ICC | MAD | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 1.40% | 1.83% | 1.31% |
| Daily | −1.35% | −2.68% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −1.03% | −4.20% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −3.96% | −9.25% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −2.99% | −12.70% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −0.02% | −13.81% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 15.04% | −9.61% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 18.77% | −6.69% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 148.99% | 85.98% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ICC vs MAD Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ICC (TEB Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and MAD (Meksa Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 12 metrics compared, ICC leads in 10 and MAD leads in 2. ICC is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MAD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): MAD leads (1.83% vs 1.40%). Daily: ICC leads (−1.35% vs −2.68%). 1 week: ICC leads (−1.03% vs −4.20%). 1 month: ICC leads (−3.96% vs −9.25%). 3 months: ICC leads (−2.99% vs −12.70%). 6 months: ICC leads (−0.02% vs −13.81%). YTD: ICC leads (15.04% vs −9.61%). 1 year: ICC leads (18.77% vs −6.69%). 3 years: ICC leads (148.99% vs 85.98%). Size (TRY): ICC leads (21.3M vs 19.6M). Investors: MAD leads (301 vs 261). Risk: ICC leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ICC or MAD?
Year to date ICC returned 15.04% and MAD returned −9.61%; over the last year ICC returned 18.77% and MAD returned −6.69%. Over the last month ICC returned −3.96% and MAD returned −9.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ICC or MAD?
As of November 2, 2026, ICC has a size of TRY 21.3M with 261 investors, while MAD has a size of TRY 19.6M with 301 investors. ICC leads in size and MAD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ICC and MAD mean?
The CMB risk score of ICC is 4 out of 7 and that of MAD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.