Yatırımcı.AI

GMF vs MZL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GMFMZL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMF vs MZL Fund Comparison
MetricGMFMZLCategory median
Daily−5.88%−1.36%−1.33%
1 week−5.55%−0.97%−0.68%
1 month−13.08%−3.21%−2.96%
3 months−6.00%0.75%0.00%
6 months−18.48%1.59%2.05%
YTD−19.35%17.68%17.79%
1 year20.95%24.45%24.45%
3 years—178.34%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMF vs MZL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GMF leads in 2 and MZL leads in 8. GMF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; MZL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MZL leads (−1.36% vs −5.88%). 1 week: MZL leads (−0.97% vs −5.55%). 1 month: MZL leads (−3.21% vs −13.08%). 3 months: MZL leads (0.75% vs −6.00%). 6 months: MZL leads (1.59% vs −18.48%). YTD: MZL leads (17.68% vs −19.35%). 1 year: MZL leads (24.45% vs 20.95%). Size (TRY): GMF leads (15.3B vs 7.8B). Investors: GMF leads (167,985 vs 153,418). Risk: MZL leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMF returned −19.35% and MZL returned 17.68%; over the last year GMF returned 20.95% and MZL returned 24.45%. Over the last month GMF returned −13.08% and MZL returned −3.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GMF has a size of TRY 15.3B with 167,985 investors, while MZL has a size of TRY 7.8B with 153,418 investors. GMF leads in size and GMF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMF is 6 out of 7 and that of MZL is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.