GCT vs MZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GCT (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Emtia Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GCT | MZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.90% | −1.83% | −1.33% |
| 1 week | −1.62% | −1.37% | −0.68% |
| 1 month | −2.39% | −4.72% | −2.96% |
| 3 months | 0.51% | −1.55% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 9.87% | −2.95% | 2.05% |
| YTD | 26.62% | 14.62% | 17.79% |
| 1 year | 34.28% | 20.64% | 24.45% |
| 3 years | 217.33% | 162.21% | 158.82% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GCT vs MZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GCT (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Emtia Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GCT leads in 8 and MZP leads in 3. GCT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GCT leads (−0.90% vs −1.83%). 1 week: MZP leads (−1.37% vs −1.62%). 1 month: GCT leads (−2.39% vs −4.72%). 3 months: GCT leads (0.51% vs −1.55%). 6 months: GCT leads (9.87% vs −2.95%). YTD: GCT leads (26.62% vs 14.62%). 1 year: GCT leads (34.28% vs 20.64%). 3 years: GCT leads (217.33% vs 162.21%). Size (TRY): MZP leads (5.1B vs 3.9B). Investors: MZP leads (120,088 vs 54,200). Risk: GCT leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GCT or MZP?
Year to date GCT returned 26.62% and MZP returned 14.62%; over the last year GCT returned 34.28% and MZP returned 20.64%. Over the last month GCT returned −2.39% and MZP returned −4.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GCT or MZP?
As of November 2, 2026, GCT has a size of TRY 3.9B with 54,200 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.1B with 120,088 investors. MZP leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GCT and MZP mean?
The CMB risk score of GCT is 4 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.