Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs MZP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GGJMZP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GGJ vs MZP Fund Comparison
MetricGGJMZPCategory median
Daily−4.86%−1.83%−1.33%
1 week−5.56%−1.37%−0.68%
1 month−14.70%−4.72%−2.96%
3 months−7.22%−1.55%0.00%
6 months−23.99%−2.95%2.05%
YTD−22.69%14.62%17.79%
1 year15.64%20.64%24.45%
3 years—162.21%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GGJ vs MZP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 0 and MZP leads in 10. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MZP leads (−1.83% vs −4.86%). 1 week: MZP leads (−1.37% vs −5.56%). 1 month: MZP leads (−4.72% vs −14.70%). 3 months: MZP leads (−1.55% vs −7.22%). 6 months: MZP leads (−2.95% vs −23.99%). YTD: MZP leads (14.62% vs −22.69%). 1 year: MZP leads (20.64% vs 15.64%). Size (TRY): MZP leads (5.1B vs 5.1B). Investors: MZP leads (120,088 vs 52,147). Risk: MZP leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GGJ returned −22.69% and MZP returned 14.62%; over the last year GGJ returned 15.64% and MZP returned 20.64%. Over the last month GGJ returned −14.70% and MZP returned −4.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 5.1B with 52,147 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.1B with 120,088 investors. MZP leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.