GCT vs GZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GCT (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Emtia Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GCT | GZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.90% | −0.19% | −1.33% |
| 1 week | −1.62% | 0.18% | −0.68% |
| 1 month | −2.39% | −1.28% | −2.96% |
| 3 months | 0.51% | 2.96% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 9.87% | 9.07% | 2.05% |
| YTD | 26.62% | 22.54% | 17.79% |
| 1 year | 34.28% | 28.55% | 24.45% |
| 3 years | 217.33% | 204.49% | 158.82% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GCT vs GZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GCT (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Emtia Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GCT leads in 6 and GZP leads in 5. GCT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZP leads (−0.19% vs −0.90%). 1 week: GZP leads (0.18% vs −1.62%). 1 month: GZP leads (−1.28% vs −2.39%). 3 months: GZP leads (2.96% vs 0.51%). 6 months: GCT leads (9.87% vs 9.07%). YTD: GCT leads (26.62% vs 22.54%). 1 year: GCT leads (34.28% vs 28.55%). 3 years: GCT leads (217.33% vs 204.49%). Size (TRY): GCT leads (3.9B vs 3.6B). Investors: GCT leads (54,200 vs 9,135). Risk: GZP leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GCT or GZP?
Year to date GCT returned 26.62% and GZP returned 22.54%; over the last year GCT returned 34.28% and GZP returned 28.55%. Over the last month GCT returned −2.39% and GZP returned −1.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GCT or GZP?
As of November 2, 2026, GCT has a size of TRY 3.9B with 54,200 investors, while GZP has a size of TRY 3.6B with 9,135 investors. GCT leads in size and GCT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GCT and GZP mean?
The CMB risk score of GCT is 4 out of 7 and that of GZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.