Yatırımcı.AI

FIF vs GZG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. İstanbul Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

FIFGZG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIF vs GZG Fund Comparison
MetricFIFGZGCategory median
Daily−0.77%3.14%−1.41%
1 week−1.09%4.60%−0.69%
1 month−3.00%3.97%−3.96%
3 months−22.98%7.01%−1.43%
6 months−24.57%32.50%1.85%
YTD−2.67%36.41%17.97%
1 year−11.37%45.39%23.69%
3 years110.79%149.53%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIF vs GZG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. İstanbul Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIF leads in 3 and GZG leads in 8. FIF is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZG leads (3.14% vs −0.77%). 1 week: GZG leads (4.60% vs −1.09%). 1 month: GZG leads (3.97% vs −3.00%). 3 months: GZG leads (7.01% vs −22.98%). 6 months: GZG leads (32.50% vs −24.57%). YTD: GZG leads (36.41% vs −2.67%). 1 year: GZG leads (45.39% vs −11.37%). 3 years: GZG leads (149.53% vs 110.79%). Size (TRY): FIF leads (369.4M vs 369M). Investors: FIF leads (4,459 vs 3,490). Risk: FIF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIF returned −2.67% and GZG returned 36.41%; over the last year FIF returned −11.37% and GZG returned 45.39%. Over the last month FIF returned −3.00% and GZG returned 3.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FIF has a size of TRY 369.4M with 4,459 investors, while GZG has a size of TRY 369M with 3,490 investors. FIF leads in size and FIF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIF is 5 out of 7 and that of GZG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.