Yatırımcı.AI

EDU vs GZG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDU (İş Portföy Tev Eğitime Destek Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

EDUGZG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EDU vs GZG Fund Comparison
MetricEDUGZGCategory median
Daily−0.45%3.14%−1.41%
1 week0.16%4.60%−0.69%
1 month−2.56%3.97%−3.96%
3 months3.33%7.01%−1.43%
6 months10.58%32.50%1.85%
YTD20.91%36.41%17.97%
1 year33.41%45.39%23.69%
3 years197.73%149.53%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EDU vs GZG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDU (İş Portföy Tev Eğitime Destek Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, EDU leads in 2 and GZG leads in 9. EDU is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZG leads (3.14% vs −0.45%). 1 week: GZG leads (4.60% vs 0.16%). 1 month: GZG leads (3.97% vs −2.56%). 3 months: GZG leads (7.01% vs 3.33%). 6 months: GZG leads (32.50% vs 10.58%). YTD: GZG leads (36.41% vs 20.91%). 1 year: GZG leads (45.39% vs 33.41%). 3 years: EDU leads (197.73% vs 149.53%). Size (TRY): GZG leads (369M vs 368.2M). Investors: GZG leads (3,490 vs 641). Risk: EDU leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EDU returned 20.91% and GZG returned 36.41%; over the last year EDU returned 33.41% and GZG returned 45.39%. Over the last month EDU returned −2.56% and GZG returned 3.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, EDU has a size of TRY 368.2M with 641 investors, while GZG has a size of TRY 369M with 3,490 investors. GZG leads in size and GZG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDU is 3 out of 7 and that of GZG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.