FBC vs RKS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FBC | RKS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.65% | — | 0.53% |
| Daily | −2.60% | 0.27% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | −2.97% | 0.63% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | −14.09% | 2.93% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | −29.15% | 9.21% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | −38.25% | 15.13% | 9.17% |
| YTD | −28.77% | 29.14% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | −26.39% | 36.96% | 30.98% |
| 3 years | 16.10% | 18.82% | 166.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FBC vs RKS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBC leads in 2 and RKS leads in 9. FBC is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RKS leads (0.27% vs −2.60%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.63% vs −2.97%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.93% vs −14.09%). 3 months: RKS leads (9.21% vs −29.15%). 6 months: RKS leads (15.13% vs −38.25%). YTD: RKS leads (29.14% vs −28.77%). 1 year: RKS leads (36.96% vs −26.39%). 3 years: RKS leads (18.82% vs 16.10%). Size (TRY): FBC leads (99.7M vs 94.5M). Investors: FBC leads (4,958 vs 128). Risk: RKS leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FBC or RKS?
Year to date FBC returned −28.77% and RKS returned 29.14%; over the last year FBC returned −26.39% and RKS returned 36.96%. Over the last month FBC returned −14.09% and RKS returned 2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FBC or RKS?
As of November 2, 2026, FBC has a size of TRY 99.7M with 4,958 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 94.5M with 128 investors. FBC leads in size and FBC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FBC and RKS mean?
The CMB risk score of FBC is 6 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.