FBC vs NAK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FBC | NAK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.21% | — | 1.01% |
| Daily | −2.60% | −0.25% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | −2.97% | −0.85% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | −14.09% | −3.21% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | −29.15% | 2.97% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | −38.25% | −3.86% | 9.17% |
| YTD | −28.77% | 0.55% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | −26.39% | — | 30.98% |
| 3 years | 16.10% | — | 166.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FBC vs NAK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FBC (One Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, FBC leads in 1 and NAK leads in 7. FBC is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NAK leads (−0.25% vs −2.60%). 1 week: NAK leads (−0.85% vs −2.97%). 1 month: NAK leads (−3.21% vs −14.09%). 3 months: NAK leads (2.97% vs −29.15%). 6 months: NAK leads (−3.86% vs −38.25%). YTD: NAK leads (0.55% vs −28.77%). Size (TRY): NAK leads (112.3M vs 99.7M). Investors: FBC leads (4,958 vs 128).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FBC or NAK?
Year to date FBC returned −28.77% and NAK returned 0.55%; over the last year FBC returned −26.39% and NAK returned —. Over the last month FBC returned −14.09% and NAK returned −3.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FBC or NAK?
As of November 2, 2026, FBC has a size of TRY 99.7M with 4,958 investors, while NAK has a size of TRY 112.3M with 128 investors. NAK leads in size and FBC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FBC and NAK mean?
The CMB risk score of FBC is 6 out of 7 and that of NAK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.