Yatırımcı.AI

EAE vs NHA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EAE (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

EAENHA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EAE vs NHA Fund Comparison
MetricEAENHACategory median
Daily−0.19%−0.40%−0.32%
1 week−0.77%−0.73%−0.74%
1 month−3.14%−3.08%−3.05%
3 months3.05%2.63%2.83%
6 months−3.67%−4.13%−4.12%
YTD5.09%2.76%2.06%
1 year15.25%12.54%12.48%
3 years—249.69%236.27%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EAE vs NHA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EAE (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EAE leads in 5 and NHA leads in 4. EAE is a Gold Fund fund managed by —; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EAE leads (−0.19% vs −0.40%). 1 week: NHA leads (−0.73% vs −0.77%). 1 month: NHA leads (−3.08% vs −3.14%). 3 months: EAE leads (3.05% vs 2.63%). 6 months: EAE leads (−3.67% vs −4.13%). YTD: EAE leads (5.09% vs 2.76%). 1 year: EAE leads (15.25% vs 12.54%). Size (TRY): NHA leads (21B vs 7.8B). Investors: NHA leads (117,735 vs 111,580).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EAE returned 5.09% and NHA returned 2.76%; over the last year EAE returned 15.25% and NHA returned 12.54%. Over the last month EAE returned −3.14% and NHA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, EAE has a size of TRY 7.8B with 111,580 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21B with 117,735 investors. NHA leads in size and NHA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EAE is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.