Yatırımcı.AI

CKF vs PKR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PKR (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) side by side.

CKFPKR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKF vs PKR Fund Comparison
MetricCKFPKRCategory median
Daily−2.64%0.28%−0.18%
1 week−1.42%0.65%0.13%
1 month−8.22%2.98%−0.64%
3 months−1.69%9.35%3.73%
6 months6.53%18.83%9.17%
YTD27.93%33.79%26.58%
1 year34.27%41.90%30.98%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKF vs PKR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PKR (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKF leads in 2 and PKR leads in 8. CKF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKR is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKR leads (0.28% vs −2.64%). 1 week: PKR leads (0.65% vs −1.42%). 1 month: PKR leads (2.98% vs −8.22%). 3 months: PKR leads (9.35% vs −1.69%). 6 months: PKR leads (18.83% vs 6.53%). YTD: PKR leads (33.79% vs 27.93%). 1 year: PKR leads (41.90% vs 34.27%). Size (TRY): CKF leads (531.7M vs 392.1M). Investors: CKF leads (2,321 vs 141). Risk: PKR leads (1 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKF returned 27.93% and PKR returned 33.79%; over the last year CKF returned 34.27% and PKR returned 41.90%. Over the last month CKF returned −8.22% and PKR returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CKF has a size of TRY 531.7M with 2,321 investors, while PKR has a size of TRY 392.1M with 141 investors. CKF leads in size and CKF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKF is 5 out of 7 and that of PKR is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.