Yatırımcı.AI

CKF vs KTM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CKFKTM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKF vs KTM Fund Comparison
MetricCKFKTMCategory median
Daily−2.64%−0.60%−0.18%
1 week−1.42%−0.00%0.13%
1 month−8.22%−3.46%−0.64%
3 months−1.69%−1.56%3.73%
6 months6.53%6.32%9.17%
YTD27.93%24.87%26.58%
1 year34.27%29.76%30.98%
3 years—176.16%166.05%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKF vs KTM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKF leads in 3 and KTM leads in 7. CKF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTM is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KTM leads (−0.60% vs −2.64%). 1 week: KTM leads (0.00% vs −1.42%). 1 month: KTM leads (−3.46% vs −8.22%). 3 months: KTM leads (−1.56% vs −1.69%). 6 months: CKF leads (6.53% vs 6.32%). YTD: CKF leads (27.93% vs 24.87%). 1 year: CKF leads (34.27% vs 29.76%). Size (TRY): KTM leads (554.5M vs 531.7M). Investors: KTM leads (5,351 vs 2,321). Risk: KTM leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKF returned 27.93% and KTM returned 24.87%; over the last year CKF returned 34.27% and KTM returned 29.76%. Over the last month CKF returned −8.22% and KTM returned −3.46%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CKF has a size of TRY 531.7M with 2,321 investors, while KTM has a size of TRY 554.5M with 5,351 investors. KTM leads in size and KTM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKF is 5 out of 7 and that of KTM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.