Yatırımcı.AI

GPF vs PKR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PKR (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) side by side.

GPFPKR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPF vs PKR Fund Comparison
MetricGPFPKRCategory median
Daily−0.89%0.28%−0.18%
1 week0.14%0.65%0.13%
1 month−3.37%2.98%−0.64%
3 months−0.26%9.35%3.73%
6 months5.71%18.83%9.17%
YTD18.45%33.79%26.58%
1 year25.45%41.90%30.98%
3 years154.50%—166.05%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPF vs PKR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPF (Garanti Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PKR (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GPF leads in 1 and PKR leads in 9. GPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKR is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKR leads (0.28% vs −0.89%). 1 week: PKR leads (0.65% vs 0.14%). 1 month: PKR leads (2.98% vs −3.37%). 3 months: PKR leads (9.35% vs −0.26%). 6 months: PKR leads (18.83% vs 5.71%). YTD: PKR leads (33.79% vs 18.45%). 1 year: PKR leads (41.90% vs 25.45%). Size (TRY): PKR leads (392.1M vs 379.6M). Investors: GPF leads (2,542 vs 141). Risk: PKR leads (1 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPF returned 18.45% and PKR returned 33.79%; over the last year GPF returned 25.45% and PKR returned 41.90%. Over the last month GPF returned −3.37% and PKR returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GPF has a size of TRY 379.6M with 2,542 investors, while PKR has a size of TRY 392.1M with 141 investors. PKR leads in size and GPF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPF is 3 out of 7 and that of PKR is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.